Ln 0

Is Ln 0 the same?

does not exist. This is because logarithms and natural logarithms are based on the exponential role. Numbers that include e will not answer 0 (unless the base is z). Think about it, the narrator says there are a lot of numbers.

ln (1) = and.

Because e = e.

Log (base 3) 81 = 4.

Because 4 is three (correct?) 81.

Under no circumstances can you increase the number 0 times. This will make the number disappear.

On the other hand, it can multiply negatively because it means equalizing. Choice: 5 2 = 1/25.

IP, it makes sense. I didn't understand until my teacher explained it to me. I'm trying to explain as much as I can!

Ln 0

Is Ln 0 the same? 3
does not exist. This is because logarithms and natural logarithms are based on the Exponential principle. Adding numbers including e will not answer 0 (unless base is z). Think about it, the revealer says there are too many.
ln (1) = and
Because e = e
Log (base 3) 81 = 4
Because 4 is three (correct?) 81
Under no circumstances can you increase the number 0 times. This will make the number disappear.
On the other hand, it can be multiplied negatively because it means taking the same. Preferences: 5 2 = 1/25
I, it makes sense. I didn't even understand until my teacher explained it to me. I tried to explain as much as possible!
When x is 0, Ln (x) is. At 0, it is indefinite.
ntion ln (x) is not defined as x = 0, so there is no answer to the question of what ln (0) is equal to.
When x is positive and very close to 0, ln (x) is negative and its absolute value is very large.
x> 0+, ln (x)>

Ln 0

Nothing ... and when you set it up, the universe becomes a simple system, you don't have the guts! _

Actually, I mean, it's nothing ... not explained ... it's a meaningless operation.

I thought maybe ln0 = infinity is on the Riemannian sphere, but the point they call infinity is not exactly the same as the real extended infinity that most people in the calculus course know about.

Corresponds to indefinite 0.